Unexpected Results of a Digg
When I first ran into Digg and read about some of the traffic that got sent to people’s websites, I thought to myself, “Man! It must be great to be Dugg! All those new readers would be awesome!” While there are some really good things that come from being Dugg (e.g. some of my regular readers found me on Digg, you become “popular” for a short period of time, etc.), there were some aspects of a Digg that I really wasn’t prepared for (e.g. my site going down, etc.).
Since I have been on the receiving end of the Digg Effect a few times, I started to look a bit more at some of the long-term and unexpected outcomes of being Dugg. Some of my finding were quite surprising.
A Digg is like a traffic accident.
People slow down to look but very few stop and get involved. My typical bounce rate on DCoT is about 66%. This means that on a typical day, 66% of the people will come in to one page and then leave my website.
Yet, during my last Digg, my bounce rate was 79.3% for the day (13 points above average) and 81.7% for the specific page that had been Dugg (15 points above average). And, I believe that this number would have been even higher had the article not referenced another article on DCoT. And, I’d be willing to bet that the vast majority of them do not return.
Digg traffic can be poor quality traffic.
There is no question that I got a lot of traffic each time that DCoT was Dugg. In fact the last time that I was Dugg, one day page views and visits increased by a factor of five over the same day of the previous week! But, who were these new visitors? Were they new tech people eager for computer knowledge? Were they IT veterans willing to share their vast array of computer skills?
In general, I would say “No”. It seems that many of the people who read the article were average people reading a story that they thought was interesting. The majority of the information that was on the rest of DCoT was of little interest to them.
A Digg can reduce your Google Pagerank.
Many people believe that the more websites that link to your website, the higher your Google Pagerank will be. So, if you get a huge influx of links because of a Digg, then logically your pagerank should also increase.
Unfortunately, this can have the exact opposite effect, depending on who is linking to you. As explained in Google’s PageRank Explained and how to make the most of it, if the pages that are linking to you have a low pagerank themselves, this can reduce your website’s and webpage’s pagerank. So, by Digg linking to you, this may increase your pagerank (Digg presently has a pagerank of 8), all of the other smaller websites and blogs may quite quickly drain than increase in pagerank.
And what’s even worse, your pagerank will continue to suffer as the links to your website are removed from a blog’s main page (which typically has the highest pagerank on the website) to subpages further down the blog (which often have a pagerank of 0!)
Links resulting from Digg can be poor quality.
One of the other issues about websites that link to your blog from a Digg is that they may be poor quality links because they are linking to the post, not your website. My last Digg was about the USB drive that helped find a lost child. Most people linked to this post not because they were interested in USB drive technology. Rather, they linked to it because they wanted others to know how to find their child. Thus, the typical blog or website that was linking to this post were family or parenting blogs.
While it is nice that these blogs found my post useful, the type of people reading these other blogs are not the type that will continue to return to DCoT or subscribe to the RSS feed.
Many web hosts don’t like websites that get Dugg and “penalize” them.
This is definitely something that I ran into. I am using shared hosting and when I was Dugg the first time, I turned to my web host for help. What did I get in return, my bandwidth was throttled and my website was shut down without notification three times. To this day, there are still restrictions on my website that they refuse to take off because my site received too many hits.
Now, I can understand that they are concerned about their other customers on the server that hosts my website but to put on restrictions and refuse to take them off again because I could experience another Digg at any moment is a bit much.
Initially, I thought that this was just my web host. Unfortunately, this seem to be a common practice for many web hosting companies and I am not likely to get any better service elsewhere short of going to dedicated hosting. And, according to the forums, this may be no better and just be a lot more expensive.
You become a target.
When you suddenly have thousands of people coming to your little blog and reading what you have to say, it is amazing how many experts come out of the woodwork to tell you that you are completely off base and that you haven’t got a clue about what you are talking about. Or, that your idea is the stupidest thing that they have ever heard on the Internet (I actually got that one).
You really need to be prepared for this one but very few people tell you about it. If you take pride in what you do and what you post about on your blog, this one can really bring you down. People will quickly express their opinions about your post simply because they can but very few (if any) really understand the ramifications of these comments unless they have been on the receiving end. And, I would be willing to bet that very few of them have.
A Digg takes a psychological toll.
Much like the previous point, you need to be psychologically ready for the Digg. In the last few Diggs on DCoT, I have noticed five distinct psychological stages of a Digg. Please note that I am not a psychologist. These are just some of the patterns that I have discovered about myself in a Digg that you may also experience.
- Excitement - “Cool, I’m on the front page of Digg! Look at all those hits!” Occurs within the first few seconds of realizing you are bing Dugg.
- Panic - “My site is down! I need to get it back up! Now!” Occurs within the first few seconds of realizing your site is unavailable to the majority of viewers.
- Desperation - “Why are my numbers dropping? I need to write another amazing post to get them back! But how?” Usually occurs between one and seven days after initial Digg. All depends upon how long the Digg Effect lasts.
- Depression - “My website sucks! Why would anyone ever Digg it again? I think I’ll quit the blog because I have nothing to offer and nobody is willing to return the favor.” This is usually the longest and most dangerous part of the Digg Effect psychology. It can last for months.
- Acceptance - “I’m going to write my blog for myself and my regular readers. Who cared if it ever gets Dugg again?” If the blog survives the Depression stage, this will generally follow but when it comes depends a great deal on the psychological profile of the blogger.
Conclusion
There is a lot of talk about how to deal with a Digg. But most of that is about what to do to keep your site up while in the middle of the Digg effect. I believe that the effect of a Digg are much further reaching most would believe.
If you found this post useful, why don't you buy me a cup of coffee to show your gratitude?
26 Responses to “Unexpected Results of a Digg”
-
SEO Theory - SEO Theory and Analysis Blog Says:
November 30th, 1999 at 12:00 amt know what to call it but this advice goes way back before the days when everyone started screaming and hollaring about links. Content is not a means toward the end of accumulating links. In fact, some people have openly acknowledged that DIGG traffic doesn’t convert well. DIGG and Adsense don’t share the Web very well. Link spammers promoting their cheap “by-the-book” SEO services helped inundate Ickipedia with trashy links and the Ickicommunity responded by appending
-
Mark Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 6:39 amI came across your blog through the exact post you mention (USB saving the child), and liked the content enough to add to my regular feed list.
I think you are right in that the vast majority of Digg referrals come through fleetingly, but some like me use Digg as a way of finding out about great sites that I want to keep reading.
Keep up the good work
-
Dave3 Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 7:02 amFound you through digg today. I know exactly how you feel, having been dugg out a few times myself. I’m still amazed at how mean the anonymous contingent of Internet can be. And you’re spot on with your ’stages of a digg.’
Cheers,
Dave3 -
Mike A Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 7:30 amThe low pagerank of a website linking to you will not lower your pagerank. That’s absurd. If that was the case we could bomb our competition with low quality backlinks to beat them.
-
Tim Fehlman Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 8:11 amIt might be absurd but it appears to be the way it is. Read the following:
-
bsherm Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 8:13 am“the type of people reading these other blogs are not the type that will continue to return to DCoT or subscribe to the RSS feed.”
Count another reader of those blogs as a new reader of DCoT. Just b/c I am becoming a parent doesn’t mean I am not tech savy..
Of course that doesn’t invalidate your comments… glad i found the site.
-
Tim Fehlman Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 8:19 amOf course, these are general observations and there are exceptions to these observations.
A very enthusiastic “Welcome!” to all of you who found DCoT via a Digg and stuck around. You are the people whom I really write this blog for.
Tim
-
Webs Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 8:36 amI went through the exact same psychological stages when I got dugg. I eventually said I don’t care anymore. If someone wants to digg me so be it, but I will write what I want to write, not what I think will get dugg.
-
Eric Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:00 amI’m an IT professional and found your site through Digg. I immediately signed up for the RSS feed. Great site, tons of useful info for anyone into technology. Some of the tips you provide have even been implemented into my job. Keep up the good work!
-
C. Rablee Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:31 amI am a Kevin Rose fan and get every episode of diggnation. I was a fan of digg early on until it was overrun by (insert your negative adjective here) kids. So I can confirm that the overwhelming majority of digg users are people that you really don’t want on your site. I think it’s fascinating that someone would be rude to you.
Keep up the good work. We the silent really do appreciate you, no matter what your Google page rank is.
-
JohnMu Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:52 amLinks of any quality will *never* decrease your Google pagerank. Never. In the worst case, the link will carry no weight and will have no influence on your pagerank. A link cannot reduce your Google pagerank. Look at the pagerank function - it is of the type:
PR(x) = something + something * sum(inbound links)Since a page cannot have a negative pagerank, any link from that page will never carry a negative value, hence the pagerank of a page will never sink, even when low-quality links point to it.
Assuming it were as you described, you would be able to knock the pagerank of any site down by throwing a bunch of junk-links at it. You cannot be expected to be held responsible for things that other sites do to your site.
There is one exception (though it does not affect pagerank): when you irresponsibly link back to all sites that link to you. If a bad site links to you and you link back, Google will assume that you have a relationship and might pass some of the “bad-neighborhoodness” back to your site as well. You’re responsible for the links on your site.
That said, I agree with the rest :-).
-
Tim Fehlman Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 10:04 amIt’s possible that I have this pagerank thing wrong. Anyone else out there have more insight into this?
Tim
-
John May Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 10:59 amYou might be wrong about the Pagerank thing, but I’m not an expert, I’ve only read a few sites on the subject.
I’ve been reading DCoT for a few months now and I found it by way of search for AutoIT, my programming language of choice. I found other articles useful, so subscribed to the RSS feed.
I had already resigned to the fact that I am going to make it hard for people to digg my site, but now this post just solidifies that thought for me. I would like people to visit my site because they like my site, I don’t want some artifical boost in traffic just to raise my pagerank or page views.
-
JohnMu Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 11:09 amTim, the real problem with pagerank is that those who know how it works don’t worry about it :-). Your goal should never be to build pagerank — it’s just something that comes over time with more and better links. Pagerank is not a measurement for the quality of your website. The only people who worry about pagerank are those who are selling links solely based on their pages pagerank — and those are the ones who are going to get bitten by Google algorithm updates (when they recognize that they’re selling links for pagerank). For everyone else it is a number that has zero relevance. Don’t worry about it.
If you want to test what happens when a PR0 page links to existing pages, try a tool like http://www.webworkshop.net/pagerank_calculator.php
But again - don’t worry about it - your PR won’t go down when bad or worthless links point to it (otherwise the wikipedia would have no pr either :-)). Ignore pagerank, it’s not worth the trouble to chase it.
-
Tim Fehlman Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 11:15 amI’m not really a pagerank chaser, per say, but it is something that I do monitor along with a number of other statistics.
My theory is that if I put the focus on good information and posts that I think my readers will want to read, then all of the other things (pagerank, traffic, etc.) will take care of themselves.
Tim
-
HMTKSteve Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 11:33 amYou skipped stage 6: Auto-bury
This is the stage you reach when diggers get tired of your site and bury it on reflex. They no longer even look at the article, just the url and the bury button.
-
Tim Fehlman Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 11:43 amWouldn’t you know it? This post has been dugg!
How ironic!
Tim
-
Webs Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 1:34 pmThat’s pretty funny!
I enjoy this blog as well, please keep up the great work!
-
Raymond Koppen Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 3:10 pmNice assesment of the digging phenomenon, I’m no expert on this though so I can’t say if hypothosis (sp?) works ….
I actually forgot how I ended up here, but it wasn’t via digg.
(btw I dug this
)Ray
-
raising4boys.com » parenting tips, tricks and commentary Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 5:27 pmI take it back, but they still have it really good » More on sweatshirts » About Trauma » Parenting Tip: Put the Joy Back into Parenting » Jill Filipovic: Resignation of Pro-Life Health Official is Just a … » Unexpected Results of a Digg
-
Webs’ Random Ideas Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 6:44 pmthe article is on Digg, you can have a massive influx of people from all over the net causing your bandwidth to get used up. It has happened to some popular sites causing them to be shut down… and some professional sites as well like school sites. The Digg effect explained: These are just some of the patterns that I have discovered about myself in a Digg that you may also experience. 1. Excitement - “Cool, I’m on the front page of Digg! Look at all those hits!” Occurs within the first few seconds of realizing you
-
onlineapps.newsvine.com - Online Apps Says:
April 3rd, 2007 at 9:48 pm[IMG Comments][IMG ]
-
pinoymaclover Says:
April 5th, 2007 at 10:42 amGreat post! I’ve kinda always hoped for the day that I come up with a digg-worthy article, but reading this now puts things in a different, and in my opinion, better perspective for me. I also like the part where you said:
“People will quickly express their opinions about your post simply because they can but very few (if any) really understand the ramifications of these comments unless they have been on the receiving end.”
So true. There’s a lot of insensitivity and negativity going around in the blogosphere. And once in awhile, it’s nice to come across blogs like yours which are written by level-headed and mature individuals.
-
Tueksta Says:
August 9th, 2007 at 5:11 pmHmm, in reply to johnMu’s comment, i wonder why my pagerank is actually -1/10 then, according to your theory that’s not possible. Apparently my site is categorized as spam or something, i have no clue why that is so.
-
The Long Tail of SEO Theory | SEO Theory - SEO Theory and Analysis Blog Says:
April 27th, 2009 at 5:26 pm[…] a means toward the end of accumulating links. In fact, some people have openly acknowledged that DIGG traffic doesn’t convert well. DIGG and Adsense don’t share the Web very […]
-
The Long Tail of SEO Theory Says:
June 26th, 2009 at 2:23 pm[…] a means toward the end of accumulating links. In fact, some people have openly acknowledged that DIGG traffic doesn’t convert well. DIGG and Adsense don’t share the Web very […]

